More teeth for Inner Line Permit

IFP Editorial: Instead of harping on how kind PM Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah is for extending ILP to the state, the Manipur government should be framing certain rules and regulations in conformity with the demands of JCILPS.

ByIFP Bureau

Updated on 19 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm

(File Photo: IFP)

(File Photo: IFP)


Of late, the Manipur chief minister and BJP leaders had been reminding the people of Manipur in recent times about the concern Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah has for the indigenous inhabitants of the state by extending the Inner Line Permit system (ILP) to Manipur. The Inner Line Permit System was extended in Manipur on December 11, 2019 under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation 1873 after an unprecedented announcement in Parliament by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in the wake of protests against the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act in the Northeast region. Manipuris had for decades been demanding a regulation to check the entry of migrants from neighbouring states and the mainland, and well, a constitutional safeguard for the indigenous population of the state particularly the Meiteis.

Manipur was very particular about the entry and exit of outsiders since the times of Kings and it used to maintain a strict registry of any outsider entering the state or any local leaving the state. Yes, a type of census was regularly carried out, as evidenced in our chronicles like Langthaballon and Sangai Phammang. Before merger, there was a pass system to regulate the entry of outsiders in the state but it was abolished on November 18, 1950 by the then Chief Commissioner Himmat Singh.

In the recent anti-outsider stir, the consensus was not on the introduction of ILP alone as demanded by a section of the society. The responsibility to carry forward the movement for protection of indigenous rights from the onslaught of non-locals was, of course, handed over to the Joint Committee on Inner Line Permit System (JCILPS) which was formed on July 4, 2012. It followed private member resolutions in the Manipur legislative assembly, one of them brought about by the late MLA Ibohalbi Singh on July 23, 2012 which was passed by voice vote.

Another MLA RK Anand also raised the issue in 2013, but the same was not given a passage. The then Congress government brought up three  Bills namely The Protection of Manipur People's Bill, 2015; The Manipur  Land Revenue & Land Reform (7th Amendment) Bill 2015 and The Manipur Shops & Establishment (2nd amendment) Bill, 2015 and the bills were passed by voice vote. While the bills were rejected by the agitators, it was also objected to by certain hill based organisations. Sapam Robinhood was killed in the agitation demanding withdrawal of the Bill on July 8, 2015.

The three Bills faced objection in the hills as they were termed anti-tribal bills and 9 persons were killed in a protest at Churachandpur. While the President of India cancelled the first bill and the two other bills were put under suspension. So it is clear that the movement was never about the extension of ILP in Manipur as projected by certain sections of the society including BJP, which so much wanted a big congratulations for it.

Although the movement frittered out, the so-called Inner Line Permit system was never implemented in the way as desired or envisaged by the self-styled champions of the movement. State-specific rules or regulations for implementation of the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation 1873 were never framed, while it was only given lip-service.

The ILP check-posts at Mao and Jiribam seem very strict in the beginning, but later on it turned out to be damp squib. JCILPS is now alleging that, many non-locals are entering the state through Mao and Jiribam without proper verification or let off without issuing valid ILP permits and there seems to be no mechanism to monitor as to how many outsiders are overstaying their welcome or a penalty for staying beyond the time allowed by the permit issued.

The state police also seems to be helpless in the absence of state specific rules and regulation with regard to the ILP except for the fact that outsiders have to possess a permit for entering and staying in Manipur. Instead of harping on how kind PM Modi and HM Shah is for extending ILP to the state, the state government should be framing certain rules and regulations in conformity with the demands of JCILPS. Unless that is done, there will be confusion and frequent face-off between JCILPS and law enforcing authorities.


First published:14 Dec 2021, 7:18 pm


IFP Bureau

IFP Bureau

IMPHAL, Manipur

Top Stories

Loading data...


Loading data...


Have a complaint, a suggestion or just some feedback about our content? Please write to onlineifp@gmail.com and we’ll do our best to address it.